Blogger KRISTI HOLL is the author of 35 books, including WRITER'S FIRST AID.

Pages

Blogroll

Archives

Categories

June 30, 2010

knowIs the advice “write what you know” valid? Yes, definitely. And no, not always.

It’s confusing advice!

Practical Knowledge

“Write what you know” makes sense when you’re ignorant in some area. For example, I know nothing about vampires, have never read a vampire book, can’t understand the whole vampire movie thing, and can’t for the life of me figure out why a blood-sucking boyfriend would be romantic. It’s just me.

This is the point though: I don’t know about vampires, and I have no business sitting down today to write a vampire novel. It would be so full of ridiculous ideas and mistakes that it would be laughable. I don’t care to look that foolish.

Use Yourself

On the other hand, says Ursula K. Le Guin in “Make your fiction truthful” (The Writer, July, 2010), “Write what you know doesn’t mean you have to know a lot. It just tells you to take what you have, take who you are, and use it. Don’t try to use secondhand feeling: use yourself.” So, does ”write what you know” mean “write exclusively about your personal experiences”?

No, I don’t think so. What you “know” can come from your personal experience–that’s true. But it also comes from other people’s experiences, from books you’ve read and movies that moved you, from research and travel–all blended together when you use your imagination.

The Best of Both Worlds

I believe in “write what you know,” but I’ve also had eleven mysteries published. I will swear to you that I’ve never stolen, kidnapped, set a place on fire, or blackmailed anyone, but I’ve written about it.

However, I made aspects of those stories familiar too. I set those mysteries in the midwest, where I lived all my life. Five are set in real places I’d visited many times. I used many people I knew for my characters. I developed themes that were coming true in my own life or my children’s lives. The character growth and change was real–and it was often me.

Get to Know Yourself

Le Guin says it this way: “If you take it in its deepest meaning, ‘write about what you know’ means write from your heart, from your own real being, your own thoughts and emotions…If you don’t know who you are and what you know, if you haven’t worked to find out what you yourself truly feel and think, then your work will probably be imitation work, borrowed from other writers.” (I hope you’ll get a copy of The Writer and read her entire article.)

You may not think you know much or have had enough interesting experiences, but you’d be wrong. If you have my Writer’s First Aid book, read the chapter on “Getting to Know You…” Take the lengthy survey about your life andwfasideview keep the information in a writer’s notebook.

The answers to that survey will unearth enough information about YOU to last you a writer’s lifetime.

December 7, 2009

foolheroAre you a hero

              

 

              or a fool?

 

 

 

 

I had never considered the question in regards to writing–until this past weekend when I was reading James Scott Bell’s new book, The Art of War for Writers: fiction writing strategies, tactics, and exercises.

Fools Rush In…

This book is written in very short chapters, just right for my weekend, which entailed a multitude of car trips back and forth across town. I just read as I was carted from place to place. You may be familiar with Bell’s other writing craft books (one of my favorites is Plot & Structure), but this book is different.

In addition to the section where Bell helps writers pull their stories up another professional notch or two, he has sections on how to plan and behave in the writing world. I was particularly struck by his comments on heroes and fools in today’s writing world. I’ll describe both, according to Bell. I hope you find yourself much more in one category than the other!

You’re a Fool If…

You’re a Hero If…

warI think you get the idea. I’m sorry to say that in our “instant gratification” world, I’ve seen a faster growth in fools lately than in heroes. However, if you’re a writer who recognizes himself in the “fool” category above, it’s never too late to change. If you haven’t alienated editors and agents with your foolish behavior, so much the better.

Be honest with yourself. If you recognize yourself in the foolish description, resolve to change. Choose humility and hard work instead of arrogance and laziness. You’ll endear yourself to other writers as well as agents and editors. And you’ll prepare yourself for a long and satisfying writing career.

Be a hero.

August 6, 2008

Let’s talk some more about voice. I’ve been re-reading Finding Your Voice: how to put personality in your writing by Les Edgerton this week. (See Chapter Four: “It’s Okay to Be Yourself. I Mean—It’s REALLY OKAY!”)

The chapter starts with a thought-provoking quote by J.F. Stephen: “Originality does not consist in saying what no one has ever said before, but in saying exactly what you think yourself.”

Les says that because of well meaning teachers (and other writing “experts”), writers learn to distrust their own basic writing instincts and personal writing voice. I know as a writing teacher that I was guilty of teaching what worked for me as “the” way to do something, whether it was how to write a rough draft or sticking to “write what you know” or any of the other rules that really worked well for me personally. It took me years to realize that many writers didn’t work well under those “rules,” and there was no right or wrong way to do things. Les says the same thing applies to voice. We try to follow the rules, try to sound like “real writers” when we write, and we end up with bland stories in some generic voice that does NOT make editors sit up and take notice.

What should we do instead? To quote Les again: Your mama was right: Just be yourself, honey, and everyone will love you, pimples, bad haircut, gap teeth and all. Just be yourself, compassionate or ironic, flirtatious or embarrassed, imperfect and real; with your style, your tone, and your sense of humor. Write as you would to that little (big? huge? stupendous?) group of admirers who is really interested in what you have to say and laughs at your jokes. Loosen up, improvise, relish the sensuality of words. Your words, your language. Not language borrowed. Remember this above all else: Readers enter many (if not, most) pieces of writing not for the story or idea so much as they do to hear the author’s voice and through it to enter his or her world. The principal appeal is the writer’s distinctive voice.

Do you find it hard to throw out writing rules you’ve learned, even when it would benefit your story? Do you feel safer writing in a blander “writerly” voice, one that won’t rock the boat or make you sound weird? Or do you feel pressured to abandon your authentic voice–and the way you see the world–in favor of “what editors want”? Share your thoughts, please!
Post tags: